%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Duper---1.0
% Problem  : NUM654^1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : duper %s

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 10:56:47 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 3.49s 3.72s
% Output   : Proof 3.49s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : NUM654^1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command    : duper %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime   : Fri Aug 25 15:46:28 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 3.49/3.72  SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.49/3.72  SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 3.49/3.72  Clause #0 (by assumption #[]): Eq (Not (more x y)) True
% 3.49/3.72  Clause #2 (by assumption #[]): Eq (∀ (Xx Xy : nat), Ne Xx Xy → Not (more Xx Xy) → less Xx Xy) True
% 3.49/3.72  Clause #3 (by assumption #[]): Eq (Not (Not (less x y) → Eq x y)) True
% 3.49/3.72  Clause #8 (by clausification #[0]): Eq (more x y) False
% 3.49/3.72  Clause #9 (by clausification #[3]): Eq (Not (less x y) → Eq x y) False
% 3.49/3.72  Clause #10 (by clausification #[9]): Eq (Not (less x y)) True
% 3.49/3.72  Clause #11 (by clausification #[9]): Eq (Eq x y) False
% 3.49/3.72  Clause #12 (by clausification #[10]): Eq (less x y) False
% 3.49/3.72  Clause #13 (by clausification #[11]): Ne x y
% 3.49/3.72  Clause #14 (by clausification #[2]): ∀ (a : nat), Eq (∀ (Xy : nat), Ne a Xy → Not (more a Xy) → less a Xy) True
% 3.49/3.72  Clause #15 (by clausification #[14]): ∀ (a a_1 : nat), Eq (Ne a a_1 → Not (more a a_1) → less a a_1) True
% 3.49/3.72  Clause #16 (by clausification #[15]): ∀ (a a_1 : nat), Or (Eq (Ne a a_1) False) (Eq (Not (more a a_1) → less a a_1) True)
% 3.49/3.72  Clause #17 (by clausification #[16]): ∀ (a a_1 : nat), Or (Eq (Not (more a a_1) → less a a_1) True) (Eq a a_1)
% 3.49/3.72  Clause #18 (by clausification #[17]): ∀ (a a_1 : nat), Or (Eq a a_1) (Or (Eq (Not (more a a_1)) False) (Eq (less a a_1) True))
% 3.49/3.72  Clause #19 (by clausification #[18]): ∀ (a a_1 : nat), Or (Eq a a_1) (Or (Eq (less a a_1) True) (Eq (more a a_1) True))
% 3.49/3.72  Clause #30 (by superposition #[19, 8]): Or (Eq x y) (Or (Eq (less x y) True) (Eq True False))
% 3.49/3.72  Clause #34 (by clausification #[30]): Or (Eq x y) (Eq (less x y) True)
% 3.49/3.72  Clause #35 (by forward contextual literal cutting #[34, 13]): Eq (less x y) True
% 3.49/3.72  Clause #36 (by superposition #[35, 12]): Eq True False
% 3.49/3.72  Clause #41 (by clausification #[36]): False
% 3.49/3.72  SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------